Archive for November, 2008

Ford: Three ways for the future

Sunday, November 30th, 2008

As a struggle for bailout cash becomes a more pressing issue, I’m going to conclude my series of three ways for Detroit’s Big Three carmakers to turn themselves around. Although the Senate is looking for ideas for fuel efficiency from the domestic automakers before it loosens the purse strings, I didn’t make that suggestion to General Motors or Chrysler, and that will remain the same for Ford. Eco-friendly halo cars, like the Chevrolet Volt, are fine, but to energize more than just one brand, the big picture must be seen.

Ford is probably in the best position to give itself a boost. It has a very strong and separate European operation that is known for building lively cars. Ford was smart to quickly move at the first signs of real danger to make plans to sell its European cars in North America (why wasn’t it smart enough to bring them over before it was in a crisis?)

So Ford should be the closest to being back on the road to profits, but these three idea will get them there faster:

GM UK takes two Top Gear awards

Sunday, November 30th, 2008

Posted Nov 30th 2008 12:38PM by Chris Tutor
Filed under: Sedans/Saloons, Supercars, Chevrolet, Vauxhall, Celebrities

As much as Jeremy Clarkson complains about fat, uncool Americans and their crudely-made, overweight cars, General Motors managed to come out on top in two categories in Top Gear’s annual awards.

If you said the Corvette ZR1 was a winner, you’d be totally correct. The 638-hp supercar was a shoo-in to win over the Top Gear team, just as we guessed when they were caught driving at at the Bonneville Salt Flats earlier this year. Chevrolet’s baddest Vette ever sped off with top honors in Top Gear’s Performance Car of the Year category.

The second award winner won’t be quite as easy to guess, mostly because it’s not sold in the U.S. Top Gear’s Executive Car of the Year is the Vauxhall Insignia which is based on GM’s Epsilon II platform. The magazine likes the car’s looks and technology. We won’t bother predicting whether we’ll see it here eventually. For that to happen, Saturn will need to be around, and right now, we’ll have to wait and see what happens on that front.

[Source: The Auto Channel]

Gallery: British Motor Show: Opel Insignia

Gallery: Top Gear at Bonneville

Gallery: First Drive: 2009 Corvette ZR1


Tell Obama, Congress to Support Electric Car Entrepreneurs

Sunday, November 30th, 2008
  • SEE ALSO: EV-Motoring.Com
  • SEE ALSO: Plug-in 2008 Exclusive Coverage
  • SEE ALSO: Plug-in Buyers Guide
  • SEE ALSO: 350 Electric Vehicle Stories and Video

Santa Rosa, CA November 29, 2008: President-elect Obama plans to “put 1 million Plug-In Hybrid cars — cars that can get up to 150 miles per gallon — on the road by 2015,” according to his website Barack Obama. The problem with this plan is that it comes in the middle of economic turmoil and financial collapse of the Big 3 automakers.

Often financial stimulus goes from the government to large corporations, and smaller innovative companies like ZAP are omitted. Over the past few decades, billions of dollars of taxpayer money have gone to the Big 3 to improve fuel-economy and support the use of advanced technologies like electric cars and almost nothing has been delivered while the industry has fought regulation at every turn. At the same time, the smaller companies that deliver receive nothing.

While plug-in hybrids are not in mass production today, ZAP is selling mass-produced, 100% plug-in, battery-electric vehicles with over 100,000 EVs delivered since 1994. ZAP has been experiencing record demand in 2008 with high gas prices and the fact that there are relatively few electric vehicles on the market. ZAP has expanded its workforce by 30 percent since January to help fill orders and expand its distribution. ZAP has done all this without federal support.

We like almost everything about Obama’s plan, especially converting the White House fleet to plug-ins by next year, making half of fleet purchases plug-ins by 2012, and providing a $7,000 tax credit for the purchase for advanced technology vehicles and conversions.

While the US auto industry does not deserve to be abandoned by our government, at the same time, it failed to deliver on its promises and failed to follow the leadership of these smaller more innovative companies that have paved the way with virtually no government assistance. By helping these smaller companies, maybe taxpayers could do even more with less money?

We urge you to please write President-elect Barack Obama, Vice President-elect Joseph Biden, your US Senate and House representatives and other civic and corporate leaders to tell them:

1) You want at least a small percent of the automaker loan bailout money and DOE grants to go to small auto manufacturers like ZAP. 2) You want to be assured that vehicles from small EV automakers like ZAP will qualify for the Federal Tax Credit, and not to limit them to conventional cars and trucks. 3) That vehicles like ZAP’s be considered for Federal and White House fleet purchases in 2009. 4) We should directly contract people to build electric vehicles.

Links: Write Obama: YOUR VISION Write Congress: CONGRESS

Dakar scrutineering, in pictures

Sunday, November 30th, 2008

Posted Nov 29th 2008 2:37PM by Jonathon Ramsey
Filed under: Motorsports

The preparations have begun for the race formerly known as the Paris-Dakar. The entrants have begun to gather in Le Havre, France, for scrutineering before shipping out to South America for the Dakar’s run across Argentina and Chile. Mike Werner was in Normandy and captured in photographs what was going on. If you ever wondered wanted to see what it takes to get ready for a big-deal international race, the words to describe the images are “intense preparation” — right down to making sure the vehicle sound level doesn’t breach 95 decibels. Follow the link to check out all the photos. And get ready to rumble.

[Source: Motorbiker]

Rossi in Rosso: MotoGP star drives Ferrari F2008 at Mugello

Sunday, November 30th, 2008

Posted Nov 29th 2008 6:55PM by Noah Joseph
Filed under: Motorsports, Ferrari, Celebrities


Click either image to see Valentino Rossi driving the Ferrari F2008 at Mugello in high resolution

The Ferrari World Finals at Mugello finished a few weeks ago. But someone appeared to have forgotten to tell the tifosi, as a loyal garrison of the Scuderia’s most loyal fans, thousand-strong, came back out last week to the track. After the Challenge series were decided, the 16M Scuderia Spider unveiled, the FXX program ran its laps and the fans celebrated the Formula One constructors’ championship, what exactly were they hoping still to see? How about the prospect of seeing an Italian driver piloting an Italian F1 car around one of Italy’s most famous tracks? And not just any driver, but Valentino Rossi, a world champion with credentials to rival Schumacher’s.

Valentino Rossi is an unassailable legend in motorbike racing, having taken the titles in the 125cc, 250cc and 500cc categories in quick succession before moving up to MotoGP and taking the championship five times… so far. Having achieved dominance on two wheels, Rossi has examined the possibility of switching to four. He’s competed in several championship rallies, winning the Monza rally in 2006. He initially tested a Ferrari F1 car at Valencia in 2006, where he embarrassed some of F1’s most experienced drivers, prompting him to consider a professional switch to Formula One before ultimately deciding to stay in MotoGP. This past week’s test session was just for fun then, but Rossi still proved his mettle. He lapped Mugello at 1:22.550 – just a second and a half behind Kimi Raikkonen’s time – on his first drive without traction control. Rain interrupted the second day of testing, but while Rossi showed promise, he admits he’d be too old to start in Formula One at this point. Shame for F1 fans, but reassuring for MotoGP aficionados. Check out the gallery of high-resolution images from Rossi’s test by clicking the thumbnails below.

Gallery: Valentino Rossi tests Ferrari at Mugello

[Source: Ferrari]

India’s burgeoning auto production industry is latest challenge facing Detroit

Sunday, November 30th, 2008

MUMBAI, India — Yet another challenge is facing the U.S. auto industry. And this time, it isn’t coming from Japan, South Korea, or Germany — or the economy.

In the next few years, Indian automakers and parts suppliers, long outcasts because of lackluster innovation and dormant technology, have ambitious plans to sell cars to American consumers and peddle parts to carmakers in the United States.

India’s anticipated foray into the already-downtrodden U.S. automotive market poses an immediate threat to Detroit’s Big Three and their domestic suppliers, already under threat of bankruptcy because of lagging sales, a tightening credit market, and competition from Asian automakers.

Indian automakers, aggressively recruiting engineers and ramping up research and development teams, are emphatic their entrance into the U.S. and global markets should be taken seriously.

For the first time, they believe they can compete globally.

“There’s a sea change,” said Pravin Shah, an executive vice president of Mahindra Motors, maker of SUVs and pickup trucks, during an interview in September in Mumbai. “People see we are getting into manufacturing that is world class.”

Mahindra Motors is setting its sights on the American SUV market, looking to place its clean diesel-powered Scorpio on U.S. roads in the near future, and taking aim at Jeep, which already is facing challenges from domestic and Asian automakers.

About the same time, Krishna Maruti, an automotive products supplier near Delhi, India’s capital, plans to begin supplying seats for Jeep. The move will take a large share of the work from Johnson Controls of Northwood, Ohio, which could mean the loss of up to 75 jobs in Ohio.

And over the next several years, Tata Motors, India’s highest-profile automaker, plans to expand its reach to include the United States. By next spring, Tata’s Nano, the world’s cheapest automobile at $2,500, will begin rolling off production lines and onto India’s roads.

“Today’s India is a very confident India,” said Debasis Ray, Tata Motors’ chief spokesman, in an interview in his office at the headquarters of Tata Group, a rapidly growing company with $600 billion in annual revenues.

For Detroit’s Big Three, India’s entry into North America will present just one more competitor in an already crowded field, said Bruce Belzowski, an associate director and assistant research scientist with the Automotive Analysis Division of the University of Michigan’s Transportation Research Institute

Mr. Belzowski said India’s automakers must have near-perfect planning before they enter the “hyper competitive” U.S. market.

“They have to be prepared with advertising, dealerships, aftermarket parts — with all of the things you need to get a brand off the ground,” Mr. Belzowski said.

OPENING THE MARKET

Until 1991, India’s government maintained strict control over the nation’s automotive industry, letting the bureaucracy determine which automakers could build which types of cars. As a result, there were few options for car buyers and little competition for carmakers, causing India’s research and development to become stagnant.

For decades, India’s passenger car market included few options other than Hindustan’s Ambassador — a basic, British-style car, often in white, and a vehicle of choice for politicians dating back to its inception in 1948 — and the Premier Padmini, often seen as black and yellow taxis dominating the rough Indian roads.

The liberalization of India’s automobile market, which began in 1991, shook the industry and ushered in massive changes that now have the nation’s largest automakers on the brink of becoming international players.

During the past 15 years, world automakers, including Ford, General Motors, and Hyundai, established themselves in India slowly cutting their way into the domestic car market and forcing Indian automakers for the first time to compete.

From his perch atop Mahindra Towers in Mumbai, Pravin Shah has a vision that would make Mahindra Motors a name known not just to Indians, but to people across the globe.

Mahindra Motors, the automotive wing of Mahindra & Mahindra, a $6 billion company and one of India’s premier business houses, already exports vehicles to 25 countries in Europe, Africa, South America, South Asia and the Middle East.

Soon, it plans to enter the U.S. market, first by selling pickups and then by rolling out its SUV.

The executive vice president for international operations of Mahindra & Mahindra’s automotive sector said his company is being cautious and deliberate in its planning, commenting that Mahindra has no plans to be a short-timer in the U.S. auto market. Instead, Mr. Shah said, his company wants to enter the market “with the intent to stay.”

Mahindra, in a partnership with Georgia-based Global Vehicles, is planning more than 320 dealerships across the United States.

“The Indians definitely are on the way here,” said Toledo car dealer Steve Taylor, who traveled to India earlier this year to meet with Mahindra and tour its facilities. “I think they have some technology — diesel and engine technology — that is going to be state of the art. It is high quality. It is going to be a less expensive kind of a car that is going to fit a bigger niche than what we see with bigger cars.”

The new automatic version of the Mahindra Scorpio sells in India for $23,800, which is comparable to the $23,640 starting price for the 2009 Jeep Liberty. It’s difficult to compare fuel efficiency as Scorpio models run on clean-burning diesel engines, getting about 19 mpg on mixed roads, and the Jeep Liberty uses a gasoline engine, reporting 22 mpg on highways. The Scorpio and Liberty have similar length and weight.

To Mr. Shah, the Scorpio is engineered unlike any SUV American consumers have seen. And before it is introduced on U.S. roads, Mr Shah expects that the Scorpio’s specifications and pricing will improve to surpass the Jeep.

“I don’t see a competitor that has a product in this size [that compares with the specifications of the Scorpio],” Mr. Shah said.

Mr. Shah said he knew nothing about rumors that Mahindra earlier this year expressed interest in buying the Jeep brand from Chrysler.

Asked why he is confident that American drivers will buy Mahindra’s SUV, Mr. Shah said: “You can’t separate the American from the SUV.”

NANO GAINS ATTENTION

When Tata Motors earlier this year introduced the Nano, the world’s cheapest passenger car, it had every intention of taking it global.

Amid much fanfare, the $2,500 Nano put Tata Motors on the automotive map and made it the symbol of Indian ingenuity when it comes to car design and forward-thinking. The Nano, which is within reach of middle-class Indians, would aim to replace the rickety three-wheelers that clog Indian roads and offer a safer alternative than motorbikes for transporting families across busy city streets.

When the Nano was unveiled Jan. 10, Tata’s Web site attracted 7.9 million hits from around the globe, giving a sense of the worldwide interest in the vehicle.

The attention directed at the Nano crystallized what has become clear to the people inside Bombay House, the longtime headquarters of the Tata Group, which boasts a portfolio of businesses in the steel, communications, information technology, chemical, and engineering fields.

Tata Motors plans for the Nano to initially be sold in India, but later in other developing countries.

“When it come to India, you look at mobility,” Mr. Ray said. “Personal mobility is a fundamental desire. But a car made affordably to transport families has never been possible.”

Mr. Ray called Tata, India’s largest carmaker, an “infant” in the realm of passenger car-making, as the company only entered the passenger vehicle segment in the 1990s, making its major foray into the market with the 1999 launch of the Tata Indica, a basic and widely popular small car built for India’s rugged roads. The company has built commercial vehicles for more than 60 years.

While India’s automakers lay out the blueprints of their entrance in the U.S. auto market, some Indian parts suppliers are already exporting to the United States.

There are hundreds of parts suppliers based in India, which historically have served Indian automakers. But as India’s reputation rises for producing quality auto parts, the demand for Indian-made components is increasing.

‘THE COST WAR IS ON’

Winning the contract to build seats for the Jeep Wrangler was a big victory for Krishna Maruti, said A.K. Bedi, the executive director of operations, as Jeep will be Krishna Maruti’s first major international venture.

Krishna Maruti, founded in 1994 as a joint venture, builds more than 600,000 seats per year, with many of them landing in Maruti Suzuki cars.

The company, which has 13 factories in India in places like Pune and Chennai, employs about 2,500, with 40 working in research and development.

Mr. Bedi said Krishna’s quality standards and approach, and “our chairman’s philosophy is the customer is god” pursuaded Chrysler to award his firm the Jeep contract.

“The quality is something we talk about, but it is the cost that the customers are looking for,” he said. “Like they say, the cost war is on.”

Steve Eder is a reporter for The Blade, sister paper of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. He can be reached at seder@theblade.com. or at 419-304-1680. First published on November 30, 2008 at 12:00 am

Why Big 3 can’t follow steel’s path

Sunday, November 30th, 2008

Earlier this decade, when it was battered by cheap imports and burdened with pension and health care obligations, America’s hemorrhaging steel industry ensured its survival by swallowing the bitter pill of bankruptcy.

Throwing themselves at the mercy of judges who kept creditors at bay, Bethlehem Steel and other Rust Belt icons shed $8 billion in pension obligations and instantly made themselves more attractive targets for acquirers. The buyers negotiated court-approved wage, benefit and other concessions from labor unions, closed outdated mills, and consolidated a fragmented industry.

The result: a leaner, globally competitive steel producers with cleaned up balance sheets and flexible cost structures that provide some shelter from cyclical downdrafts.

Could the same prescription cure Detroit’s Big 3?

Analysts believe the discipline and focus bankruptcy exerted on debilitated steelmakers would be good for the Big 3, given their public relations gaffe of taking corporate jets to Washington to plead for a $25 billion loan.

But analysts said there are a host of reasons why the court-supervised regimen won’t work for the Big 3. The auto industry faces more severe problems and a much grimmer economic outlook and may not find rescuers who can arrange financing in gridlocked credit markets. Moreover, customers likely will think twice about buying from a bankrupt car maker that may not be able to provide warranty coverage, fix their recalled vehicles or offer parts and service.

“I don’t think the bankruptcy route is a viable option. It’s a dramatically different situation than the steel industry faced,” said Scott Paul of the Alliance for American Manufacturing.

The Washington, D.C.-based policy analyst said the auto industry has a much larger economic footprint than steel. Including dealers and parts suppliers, it employs more than 1.5 million workers, spends $156 billion annually on parts, materials and services and supports as many as one in 10 U.S. jobs. Car manufacturers are the biggest customers for steel, plastics, electronics and computer chips.

“This is not an economic crisis that’s confined to Detroit,” Mr. Paul said. “The stakes for American manufacturing in general are very high.”

The industry’s reach in a faltering economy — and the key role organized labor played in President-elect Barack Obama’s victory — give the industry enormous leverage.

“We certainly can’t afford to have another million or million and a half people to be out of work next year. That’s where we would see this thing going if they don’t get any money,” said George Magliano, an auto industry analyst with IHS Global Insight.

‘Significantly worse’

General Motors, Ford and Chrysler have borrowed parts of the steel industry’s recovery plan. Their latest contracts with the United Auto Workers union were supposed to provide breathing room until 2010, when they would be on more competitive footing with Toyota and other foreign competitors.

Those contracts included setting aside billions to cover the future cost of retiree health care benefits through trust funds called voluntary employee beneficiary associations, or VEBA’s. Steelmakers lightened their balance sheets by transferring their responsibility to pay the benefits to the trust funds. The Big 3 hope to do the same by pouring billions of their own money and redirecting a portion of UAW-represented workers’ paychecks into the trust funds before 2010.

But their best laid plans didn’t factor in the most serious economic unrest since the Great Depression, auto sales dropping to a 25-year low, and credit markets drying up.

“The issue today is that business got so much worse that the plans they put in place do not work. With sales falling through the floor, those plans don’t make sense anymore,” Mr. Magliano said.

Even when the steel industry hit bottom, a few stable producers remained standing that had enough staying power to acquire their fallen foes, such as U.S. Steel’s $1.3 billion acquisition of National Steel. Also, a major financial buyer emerged: financier Wilbur Ross, who lined up credit to purchase Bethlehem, LTV Steel and Weirton Steel.

The Big 3 have attracted some private capital in recent years, with Cerberus Capital Management acquiring a controlling stake in Chrysler last year for $7 billion. But there is no private source of capital to fund their way out of the recession now.

“You can’t consolidate losers. That’s where we stand now,” said Fariborz Ghadar, director of the Center for Global Business Studies at Penn State’s Smeal College of Business. “Somebody’s got to get rid of the stream of obligations that are there.”

Dr. Ghadar believes the auto industry “is in significantly worse shape than the steel industry.”

Steel’s good timing

Moreover, with the recession expected to deepen and last well into next year, the Big 3 probably won’t benefit from the kind of economic lift that hastened the steel industry’s recovery. Booming demand for steel in China, the Middle East and other parts of the globe and a weaker U.S. dollar led to higher prices, relief from imports and export opportunities for U.S. steelmakers, said Tony Taccone of First River Consulting in Pittsburgh.

“It was the global environment that really created an opportunity for restructured mills,” Mr. Taccone said. “Heading into a global boom for commodities and steel helped them revive.”

Although the bankruptcy process is cumbersome and expensive, Mr. Taccone said, the costs can be offset by the discipline it imposes. Like many, he’s concerned a $25 billion loan may buy some time for the Big 3 but won’t address their underlying issues.

“What gives you the comfort level that they’re going to come up with a restructuring plan?” he said. “The government’s experience at transforming industry is not particularly good, so you can’t really look to the government to solve the problem.”

On Friday, the Big 3 will make their case for the $25 billion loan before the House Financial Services Committee. No matter how they get to Washington, industry officials are expected to provide detailed plans for restructuring operations and producing more fuel-efficient cars that consumers will buy.

Mr. Paul concedes that in the wake of the government engineered rescues of Bear Stearns, AIG, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Citigroup, “there is a little bailout fatigue.” But he’s hopeful that after doing so much for white collar industries, regulators will approve a much smaller rescue plan for a blue collar one.

“The right decision to make is a $25 billion bridge loan that would be repaid with some conditions attached to it,” he said.

Mr. Paul believes that would be less expensive than government bearing the costs of unemployment benefits, social services and other relief that would have to be provided to workers and families who depend on the automotive industry. Dr. Ghadar agrees.

“It’s politically unacceptable and that’s why I think they’re going to do something about it,” the Penn State professor said.

Len Boselovic can be reached at lboselovic@post-gazette.com or 412-263-1941. First published on November 30, 2008 at 12:00 am

Race Glaze Pre-Wax Cleaner

Sunday, November 30th, 2008

Auto Express Car Reviews

30th November 2008

Key to getting the best finish when waxing is good preparation – and Race Glaze’s new Pre-Wax Cleaner does just that.

It removes old wax and grime and replenishes paint with its blend of oils. Designed for quick and easy use, it’s non-abrasive, unlike a polish. Plus, Pre-Wax helps fine waxes bond better with the paint – even if the car has just been sprayed.

Race Glaze Pre-Wax Cleaner

Sunday, November 30th, 2008

Auto Express Car Reviews

30th November 2008

Key to getting the best finish when waxing is good preparation – and Race Glaze’s new Pre-Wax Cleaner does just that.

It removes old wax and grime and replenishes paint with its blend of oils. Designed for quick and easy use, it’s non-abrasive, unlike a polish. Plus, Pre-Wax helps fine waxes bond better with the paint – even if the car has just been sprayed.

New safety test - NCAP cracks the whip!

Sunday, November 30th, 2008

Auto Express Car Reviews

30th November 2008

Whiplash is far more common and serious than you’d think. Its symptoms can be painful, debilitating and last for several years. It also accounts for more than half of Europe’s personal injury claims – costing billions of pounds annually. So, which new cars offer the best protection? You can now find out. Euro NCAP’s independent crash tests incorporate a rear impact assessment which measures exactly that – and Auto Express has been given exclusive access to the results!

The test examines the size and shape of the car’s seat, and its performance in a series of three sled trials ranging from low to high-intensity impact. Each model is marked out of four points and classified with an associated colour.

A ‘good’ green result reflects a seat that offers state-of-the-art performance and reduces long- term injuries by up to 40 per cent. A ‘marginal’ or yellow result means the chair may help, but needs further improvement. A ‘poor’ or red result indicates the seat will not be helpful in preventing a potential injury.

The first vehicles to get the treatment were 25 cars already recently crash tested. And as our table reveals, there was a shocking variation in the results. Only five achieved a green rating, proving there’s plenty of room for improvement.

But the most appalling figures are at the foot of the table, where three models achieved zero points. And you’ll be stunned to hear three out of the bottom five cars – the Peugeot 308 CC, Ford Kuga and Citroen C5 – managed a five-star rating in NCAP’s usual Adult Occupant Protection test.

A spokeswoman for the body said: “If the whiplash protection test was immediately integrated as part of a car’s NCAP star rating, these three models would move down a grade. It’s a wake-up call for manufacturers.”

Only two makers in the list – BMW and Mercedes – employ active head restraints designed specifically to reduce whiplash in a rear-end collision. Yet they could manage only seventh and 16th on the list respectively, suggesting their technologies are not as effective as their marketing claims.

It came as no surprise that Volvo topped the table. It’s a company which stakes its reputation on being at the cutting edge of crash protection, as Hans Nyth, director of the Volvo Cars Safety Centre, confirmed: “Safety is a high priority and we are pleased that the new XC60 has performed in line with our expectations from our own tests and standards.”

In fact, Volvo has installed dedicated whiplash protection on seats on its production cars since the WHIPS system was introduced on the S80 in 1999. This simple but effective set-up is explained on the opposite page.

So, just what makes the difference between a dangerous and a well designed seat? The head restraint and its correct adjustment are the most important aspect of a good anti-whiplash design. The rest must be as close to the back of the head as possible and the top of the cushion should be at least as high as the top of the skull.

Also, the seat itself should control the relative movements between the occupant’s torso and head, and be capable of dissipating the energy of impact while keeping the occupant securely in place.

From February next year, if manufacturers still want to achieve the maximum five-star NCAP rating, they can no longer ignore the whiplash performance of their models.

A new scoring system will be introduced, where the marks from the rear-impact test will contribute to a car’s final tally in Adult Occupant Protection.

This, together with scores from Euro NCAP’s three other areas of assessment – child occupant protection, pedestrian protection and safety assist – will contribute to the award of an overall star rating for the vehicle. If these initial findings are anything to go by, let’s hope the manufacturers are bracing

Why latesttest matters

It’s a complaint that’s often not taken seriously, but whiplash can have a painful and long-lasting effect. Caused by a sudden distortion of the neck, it is not uncommon in frontal and side-impact accidents, but it more often occurs in low-speed, rear-end shunts.

Mild symptoms involve stiffness and tenderness of the upper back and neck muscles, as well as headaches and dizziness. Such cases are classed as short-term and can last up to three months.

More serious, long-term cases can involve permanent impairment, plus neurological and musculoskeletal injuries. Also, whiplash is hard to diagnose and costly to treat. Accounting for more than half of Europe’s personal-injury claims, such soft-tissue neck injuries currently cost billions of pounds every year.

How do your car’s seats rate in Euro NCAP tests?

CAR / SCORE / RESTRAINT

Volvo XC60 / 3.54 / Fixed head restraint
Alfa Romeo MiTo / 3.35 / Non-locking Reactive-type head restraint. No tilt adjustment
Volkswagen Golf MkVI / 3.31 / Standard head restraint. No tilt adjustment
Audi A4 / 3.15 / Standard head restraint. No tilt adjustment
Vauxhall Insignia / 3.06 / Standard-type head restraint. Non-locking tilt adjustment
Renault Koleos / 2.94 / Standard-type head restraint. Non-locking tilt adjustment
BMW X3 / 2.44 / Locking Pro-Active-type head restraint. Locking tilt adjustment
Lancia Delta / 2.43 / Non-locking Reactive-type head restraint. No tilt adjustment
Renault Kangoo 2 / 2.38 / Standard-type head restraint. No tilt adjustment
Honda Accord / 2.26 / Non-locking Reactive-type head restraint. No tilt adjustment
Skoda Superb / 2.22 / Standard head restraint. No tilt adjustment
Ford Fiesta / 2.21 / Standard head restraint. No tilt adjustment
Hyundai i30 / 2.21 / Reactive-type head restraint. Locking tilt adjustment
Renault Mégane / 2.19 / Standard head restraint. No tilt adjustment
SEAT Ibiza / 1.96 / Standard head restraint. No tilt adjustment
Mercedes M-Class / 1.82 / Locking Pro-Active-type head restraint. Non-locking tilt adjustment
Dacia Sandero / 1.58 / Fixed head restraint
Daihatsu Cuore / 1.10 / Standard head restraint. No tilt adjustment
Citroen Berlingo / 1.04 / Standard head restraint. No tilt adjustment
Hyundai i10 / 0.94 / Standard head restraint. No tilt adjustment
Citroen C5 / 0.57 / Standard-type head restraint. Non-locking tilt adjustment
Ford Kuga / 0.44 / Standard head restraint. No tilt adjustment
Daihatsu Terios / 0.00 / Standard head restraint. No tilt adjustment
Peugeot 308 CC / 0.00 / Fixed head restraint
Suzuki Splash / 0.00 / Standard head restraint. No tilt adjustment